This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
A XSL processor with better error handling than XT?
- To: docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Subject: DOCBOOK: A XSL processor with better error handling than XT?
- From: Thorbjoern Ravn Andersen <ravn at mip dot sdu dot dk>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 00:51:05 +0100 (MET)
- Reply-To: docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
I am currently learning DocBook XML with Emacs and XT under Linux on a
memory constrained laptop, where I write the tags "in hand".
My question is: XT only reports the first error in the XML file, and then
stops. Is there another XML processor which reports more errors in a
non-well formed document, in order to fix them all in one swoop?
I have found the XSL language to be a very nice way to use tags in a way
that for some reason goes well with me, and reminds me a lot more of Lisp
than I would have thought (especially after having written perl to adjust
HTML code). The XSL style sheets for DocBook are still early in
development - are there any efforts other than Norms own that work on
developing these?
Best regards,
--
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen "...plus...Tubular Bells!"
http://www.mip.sdu.dk/~ravn