This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
Re: new problems with xt and passivetex...
- To: arrigo at vision dot caltech dot edu
- Subject: DOCBOOK: Re: new problems with xt and passivetex...
- From: "Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian dot rahtz at computing-services dot oxford dot ac dot uk>
- Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2000 22:58:01 +0100 (BST)
- Cc: docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org, jjc at jclark dot com
- References: <200006030050.RAA27589@modena.vision.caltech.edu>
- Reply-To: docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
Arrigo Benedetti writes:
> I'm trying to typeset the following XML document (test.xml), compliant
> with the Simplified DocBook XML V4.0.1, by using the latest DocBook XSL
> stylesheets:
The Docbook XSL stylesheets us an old version of the XSL FO spec;
PassiveTeX implements (partially) the current draft, so don't expect
it to work in this situation.
> and test.fo seems to be fine. My first question is : is there is any way
> to have xt use the DTD catalog so I don't need to specify the full path
> /usr/local/sgml/sdb401/sdocbook.dtd in the DTD declaration?
yes, there is, I am sure its referenced from Norm Walsh' site, its a
small patch/addon for XT
> [...]
>
> </5:region-after>
> </5:simple-page-master>
> </5:layout-master-set>
> Finish defining page masters
you can cut out all this verbosity by uncommenting
\xmltraceoff in xmltex.cfg
> Any ideas? Should I try jadetex instead?
depends what you are trying to achieve...
sebastian