This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
Re: No <co> in <userinput> ?
- To: docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: No <co> in <userinput> ?
- From: Nik Clayton <nik at nothing-going-on dot demon dot co dot uk>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 18:09:56 +0000
- Organization: Nik at home, where there's nothing going on
- References: <20000629203420.A1587@catkin.nothing-going-on.org><87og4gql7g.fsf@nwalsh.com>
On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 05:24:51PM -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
> / Nik Clayton <nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk> was heard to say:
> | Is there any reason why <co> (callout) is allowed in <screen> but
> | disallowed in <userinput>? I'd have thought being able to mark parts
> | of a user's command line to refer back to in discussion would be a useful
> | facility.
>
> I don't think we ever considred someone wanting to put CO inside an
> inline. It doesn't seem unreasonable to me. File an RFE and we'll
> discuss it at the next meeting.
Done. Incidentally, do you think it would be worthwhile having new
RFEs automatically posted here for further discussion?
N
--
Internet connection, $19.95 a month. Computer, $799.95. Modem, $149.95.
Telephone line, $24.95 a month. Software, free. USENET transmission,
hundreds if not thousands of dollars. Thinking before posting, priceless.
Somethings in life you can't buy. For everything else, there's MasterCard.
-- Graham Reed, in the Scary Devil Monastery