This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
RE: Re[2]: Which conversion method should I use?
- From: David Cramer <dcramer at broadjump dot com>
- To: Jose <studio at qadram dot com>, docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Cc: docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 14:11:03 -0500
- Subject: RE: DOCBOOK: Re[2]: Which conversion method should I use?
This is a tools thread, so it should really be on docbook apps:
http://docbook.org/wiki/moin.cgi/DocBookAppsMailingList
I recall there's some information in this post:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/docbook-apps/2002-q1/msg00726.html (tho
I've only ever used PassiveTeX on linux--I tried, not very hard, to get
it working on windows once).
There's a list of fo renderers at
http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/doc/publishing.html#d
0e65. Add to that list Antenna house (commercial):
http://www.antennahouse.com/.
David
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jose [mailto:studio@qadram.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 1:31 PM
> To: docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: DOCBOOK: Re[2]: Which conversion method should I use?
>
>
> Hello Norman,
>
> Friday, June 21, 2002, 5:53:06 PM, you wrote:
>
> NW> | I would prefer a Windows solution, but if I have
> no choice, I
> NW> | would use Linux.
>
> NW> I think all of the possible tools can be made to work on Windows.
>
> I'm using xsltproc and FOP to transform a DocBook document to PDF on
> Windows, but I have some problems with <programlisting> because all
> the source code is aligned to the right and some kind of justified.
> Another member of this list pointed me to use PassiveTex, but I think
> it's a Linux only solution, Can I run PassiveTex on Windows?, If so,
> could you tell me how?. There's another FOP processor for Windows?
>
> Best Regards.