This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
Re: Re: What is the best way to express a relationshipbetween two biblioentrys
- From: Alan Cocks <ajcocks at connexus dot net dot au>
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com>
- Cc: docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 07:33:05 +1100
- Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Re: What is the best way to express a relationshipbetween two biblioentrys
- References: <001d01c2d8d0$121d4320$2e59decb@mistress><87bs17ypbg.fsf@nwalsh.com>
- Xantivirus: This e-mail has been scanned for viruses via the Connexus InternetService
> | How should one express the relationship between two distinct
BIBLIOENTRYs?
> You could simply put the two biblioentrys next to each other. For what
> purpose do you want to establish a link between them?
My aim is that, when it comes time to transform the bibliography into a
website, I will be able to automatically produce several different views of
the data, for example:
- one presenting each primary source and its related secondary sources
together
- another presenting the entries in chronological order of publication
- another ordered alphabetically by author.
I'd also like to have the option of generating a list of the chapters in a
book that have been previously published as articles, and conversely,
chapters that have subsequently been reprinted, for instance, in a
newspaper.