This is the mail archive of the docbook@lists.oasis-open.org mailing list for the DocBook project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: sgml vs xml

From: Jirka Kosek <jirka at kosek dot cz>
To: Camille Bégnis <camille at mandrakesoft dot com>
Cc: Ben Hratshorne <docbook at green dot hartshorne dot net>, docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 10:53:10 +0100
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: sgml vs xml
References: <20030307012858.GM39643@radix.cryptio.net><20030307104350.54af0878.camille@mandrakesoft.com>

Camille Bégnis wrote:

> I think the situation is the following: SGML is the legacy system most people get on using because it allows acceptable print output. 

This is not quite truth. With SGML you are mostly using DSSSL
stylesheets and toolchain which has quite good print output. But this
toolchain (DSSSL + Jade/OpenJade) can be used also with XML sources.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek  	                     
  e-mail: jirka at kosek dot cz
  http://www.kosek.cz

Follow-Ups:
- Re: sgml vs xml
  - From: Yann Dirson

References:
- sgml vs xml
  - From: Ben Hratshorne
- Re: sgml vs xml
  - From: Camille =?unknown?q?B=E9gnis?=

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]