This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
Re: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday at mindspring dot com>
- To: Jeff Biss <jeff at marco-inc dot com>
- Cc: Carlos Araya <carlos at cvc dot edu>, David Cramer <dcramer at motive dot com>,docbook mailing list <docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:49:20 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Jeff Biss wrote:
> As I see it now you have a point in seeing that the procedure element be
> included as a child of the paragraph element. It does make sense,
> especially in context of the other child elements. Why not put in an RFE
> at: http://sourceforge.net/projects/docbook/?
been there. done that. time to move on.
rday