This is the mail archive of the docbook@lists.oasis-open.org mailing list for the DocBook project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?

From: Jeff Biss <jeff at marco-inc dot com>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday at mindspring dot com>
Cc: Carlos Araya <carlos at cvc dot edu>, David Cramer <dcramer at motive dot com>,docbook mailing list <docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 13:24:12 -0600
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303121348570.20147-100000@dell>

If I may inquire, what ever happened to your RFE? I assume it wasn't implemented, any reason why?

Jeff

Robert P. J. Day wrote:

On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Jeff Biss wrote:

As I see it now you have a point in seeing that the procedure element be 
included as a child of the paragraph element. It does make sense, 
especially in context of the other child elements. Why not put in an RFE 
at: http://sourceforge.net/projects/docbook/?


been there.  done that.  time to move on.

rday

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?
  - From: Robert P. J. Day

References:
- Re: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?
  - From: Robert P. J. Day

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]