This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
Re: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday at mindspring dot com>
- To: Jeff Biss <jeff at marco-inc dot com>
- Cc: Carlos Araya <carlos at cvc dot edu>, David Cramer <dcramer at motive dot com>,docbook mailing list <docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:04:48 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Jeff Biss wrote:
> If I may inquire, what ever happened to your RFE? I assume it wasn't
> implemented, any reason why?
well, i submitted it this morning. i guess norm is slacking
again. :-)
rday