This is the mail archive of the docbook@lists.oasis-open.org mailing list for the DocBook project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [docbook] Re: Ruminations on the future of DocBook


Jirka Kosek wrote:
> Tobias Reif wrote:
>> I'm not sure what I meant back then, but I do think that there should
>> be one normative schema included in the spec (eg a normative/official
>> RNG).
>> I guess what I meant was that tools processing DocBook documents
>> should not be required to support any specific schema language (eg
>> requiring WXS+PSVI support for conformance). DTD support is required
>> through the XML spec, but ideally the DBX spec should avoid building
>> on this type of dependency.
>
> Having formal syntax description of DocBook in some language (e.g.
> RelaxNG) as normative part of DocBook standard doesn't mean that tools
> must be RelaxNG aware.

Yes I know, I didn't say it would.
Instead I wrote "tools processing DocBook documents should not be required to support any specific schema language".


My point is *general*, and adresses long-term strategies. It mostly warns about things that are purely fictional (potential dependencies in general), and does not refer to specific technical issues that are here today (other than DTD default attributes etc, which should disappear anyways).

If I would refer to specific Relax NG issues, I would explicitly say so.

> I definitively think that DocBook standard should formally, precisely
> and unambiguously define DocBook grammar and this can't be done
> without
> some sort of formal language. AFAIK the best language for this is RNG
> at these days.

Just above I wrote "I do think that there should be one normative schema included in the spec (eg a normative/official RNG)".
An weeks ago I wrote
"Sure there must be at least one normative schema in addition to the human lang spec."


So I agree with you, and I'd happy with a normative RNG, just as you are.

My point or my description thereof seems to be extremely prone to misunderstanding, sorry if the latter is the case.

Tobi

--
http://www.pinkjuice.com/


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-help@lists.oasis-open.org


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]