This is the mail archive of the ecos-devel@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: eCos for Renesas EDOSK-2674

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn dot ch>
To: Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>
Cc: Uwe Kindler <ukindler at htwm dot de>, ecos-devel at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:16:36 +0100
Subject: Re: eCos for Renesas EDOSK-2674
References: <000701c3c60c$55aa7ed0$2c79378d@uwepc> <40299631.8050703@eCosCentric.com> <001701c3f493$18c66190$2c79378d@uwepc> <40312D5C.5040102@eCosCentric.com>

> In the current sources, things like the idle thread stack are defined as:

> static char 
> idle_thread_stack[CYGNUM_KERNEL_CPU_MAX][CYGNUM_KERNEL_THREADS_IDLE_STACK_SIZE] 
> 
>   CYGBLD_ATTRIB_ALIGN(CYGARC_ALIGNMENT);
> 
> The last bit maps to __attribute__((align(CYGARC_ALIGNMENT))).

No its not. At least not the current anoncvs sources. Are you sure you
don't have some uncommitted patches applied Jifl?

      Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: eCos for Renesas EDOSK-2674
  - From: Jonathan Larmour

References:
- Re: eCos for Renesas EDOSK-2674
  - From: Jonathan Larmour
- Re: eCos for Renesas EDOSK-2674
  - From: Uwe Kindler
- Re: eCos for Renesas EDOSK-2674
  - From: Jonathan Larmour

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]