This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Trouble running ecosconfig under Linux/alpha


Stephen Williams wrote:
> 
> jlarmour@cygnus.co.uk said:
> > The reason for my doubts was that I *have* heard of successes on alpha
> > linux, so there is hope :)
> 
> If there is hope, I shall keep up the fight. Especially if my questions
> keep getting answered. It would be nice, if I manage to succeed, if
> the required steps are written down somewhere so the next Linux/alpha
> user will be able to find it.

Write a FAQ entry and I'll gladly put it in.

> jlarmour@cygnus.co.uk said:
> > gcc 2.95.2 sources include libstdc++.
> 
> The issue is how to make sure the right libstdc++-*.so is brought in
> at runtime by a program that is compiled by a compiler and C++ library
> installed in a non-standard place. (Whew!( This is what I must figure
> out in order to get gcc-2.95.X to coexist with my existing compiler.

I think gcc 2.95.2 only tries to build libstdc++ statically so this may be
somewhat of a non-issue (except that the resulting ecosconfig may be a bit
plump).

> This is something I should be able to handle, though. It's rather time-
> consuming and I would just like some reasonable hope that it will solve
> the problem at hand.

I can't honestly say it is a certainty - but it's one of the first things
I'd try; or at least I'd say building gcc is easier than debugging libcdl
:). I was rather hoping another Alpha linux user would pipe up though.

Jifl
-- 
Red Hat, 35 Cambridge Place, Cambridge, UK. CB2 1NS  Tel: +44 (1223) 728762
"Plan to be spontaneous tomorrow."  ||  These opinions are all my own fault

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]