This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Thread states
- To: Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] Thread states
- From: Paleologos Spanos <paleolog at ee dot ucla dot edu>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 00:16:52 -0800 (PST)
- cc: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> Paleologos Spanos wrote:
> >
> > Hi,I have a question regarding the state of thread.
> >
> > -When a thread finishes its work what is its state? the "EXITED"?
> > The question is if the "exited" state is showing that the thread has
> > finished execution or it is the state after having exit(with the exit
> > function) the thread?
>
> The former - although from your description the latter would imply the
> former anyway?
>
> > -If I want to stop the execution of a thread and then start it again from
> > the beggining again(not from the point it stopped) which
> > are the appropriate functions? exit and then resume,or kill and then
> > resume?
>
> I think you are a bit confused: you call cyg_thread_exit() to exit the
> calling thread; you call cyg_thread_kill() to request another thread exits.
>
> When the thread exits you can call cyg_thread_resume() on it.
>
> > -Will this thread be present on the wait_queue of the bitmap
> > scheduler?(assuming that we have the bitmap scheduler)
>
> At what point?
>
From what I have understood ,the wait_queue is a number of bits with
every bit to represent a specific thread which is on the scheduler.So
every bit is 1 if the corresponding thread is waiting for execution or 0
if it has finished(EXITED state).Is this correct?
So,in my previous mail I was asking if after a thread has completed its
execution ,will the corresponding bit on the wait_queue become 0.
Thank you.
> Jifl > --
> Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
> Un cheval, pas du glue. Pas du cheval, beaucoup du glue. || Opinions==mine
>