This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Reply-To the list (was: Re: ROM File system ?)
- To: Fabrice Gautier <gautier at email dot enst dot fr>
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] Reply-To the list (was: Re: [ECOS] ROM File system ?)
- From: Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour at redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 19:51:51 +0100
- Cc: Gary Thomas <gthomas at cambridge dot redhat dot com>,eCos Discussion <ecos-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
- Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd.
- References: <3AF00252.98739F4B@sxb.bsf.alcatel.fr> <XFMail.20010502070508.gthomas@cambridge.redhat.com> <20010502155613.ED42.GAUTIER@email.enst.fr>
Fabrice Gautier wrote:
>
> On Wed, 02 May 2001 07:05:08 -0600 (MDT)
> Gary Thomas <gthomas@cambridge.redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Note: responses directed to Red Hat employees which are not also copied
> > to the eCos discussion list will be ignored. This one has been answered
> > as a favour, once only.
>
> Could the list manager add a Reply-To: header set to the list?
> This would probably avoid some part of the problem...
This can be a matter of religious debate. See:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
And my preference is to agree. A small number of the internal lists within
Red Hat set Reply-To and it causes more problems than I believe it
prevents.
Jifl
--
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine