This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: net threads priority

From: Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour at redhat dot com>
To: Robin Farine <acnrf at dial dot eunet dot ch>
Cc: "ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com" <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:41:59 +0000
Subject: Re: [ECOS]net threads priority
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd.
References: <3C42FB8E.BC78DEC7@deis.unibo.it> <20020114165720.O23117@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> <1011080587.7311.2.camel@halftrack>

Robin Farine wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2002-01-14 at 16:57, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >
> > By default, the schedular has 32 levels. I expect priority 99 is
> > causing it a problem. Do you asserts enabled? I guess not or you would
> > of seen this problem. I suggest you enable them. Look in the infra
> > package.
> 
> IIRC, this won't help since the mlqueue implementation doesn't ensure
> that it gets a correct priority value.


mlqueue.cxx:215:
    CYG_ASSERT((CYG_THREAD_MIN_PRIORITY >= pri) 
               && (CYG_THREAD_MAX_PRIORITY <= pri),
               "Priority out of range!");

?

Jifl
-- 
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine

Follow-Ups:
- Re: net threads priority
  - From: Robin Farine

References:
- net threads priority
  - From: Andrea Acquaviva
- Re: net threads priority
  - From: Andrew Lunn
- Re: net threads priority
  - From: Robin Farine

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]