This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Re: eCos tools' gcc minor version
Robin Farine wrote:
>
> Ah, now it becomes a little clearer. So this Cygnus gcc version
> corresponds more or less to egcs-1.1.1 (wich became gcc-2.9[01])?
In terms of features it's clearer to 2.95. It was branched about when 2.95
was branched to be stabilised.
> For an StrongARM target, may I safely use the vanilla gcc-2.95.3 patched
> with ecos-gcc-2952.patch from the Red Hat website (the reload1.c chunk
> removed since it seems 2.95.3 includes a fix for this), or should I
> better use a pre-2.95.4 CVS snapshot?
For strongarm you probably don't need a patch at all.
One of things I'll be doing as part of (or at least immediately after) v2
is released is updating all the instructions for 3.0.
Jifl
--
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss