Re: [ECOS] EB40A port is done!

[Tim Drury <tdrury at siliconmotorsports dot com>]

This is not a suggestion, but just a comment for discussion:

Since Redhat has dropped eCos officially, and the eCos
developers are busy and possibly looking for other jobs,
would it be possible to allow some long-time, trusted
contributors to eCOS CVS commit access?

-tim


On Tuesday 16 July 2002 05:30 am, Koeller, T. wrote:
> No, it has not, nor has any of my other AT91-related
> patches. It seems that currently nobody cares. I'd really
> like to know if this is going to change any time soon.
> After all, the AT91 is a popular platform and the old
> AT91/EB40 HAL is unsuitable for developing new platform
> HALs.
>
> I tried to rename my HAL to something like 'at91-modular'
> and install it side-by-side with the old one, but that did
> not work, because packages like the flash or serial drivers
> still are tied to the old HAL and would need to be modifed
> for this to work.
>
> Hey, eCos maintainers, any comments?
>
> tk
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tim Drury [mailto:tdrury@siliconmotorsports.com]
> > Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 5:39 AM
> > To: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
> > Subject: [ECOS] EB40A port is done!
> >
> >
> > ...
> > Has Thomas Koeller's patches made it into CVS yet?  I need to
> > get a fresh
> > copy then isolate my exact changes and remove all my debug code.
> > ...
> >
> > -tim drury
> >
> >
> > --
> > Before posting, please read the FAQ:
> > http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
> > and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss