This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Unresolved conflict

From: Gary Thomas <gary at chez-thomas dot org>
To: ecos at navosha dot com
Cc: Venkatesh <venkatc at in dot ceeyes dot com>,eCos Discussion <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: 24 Jul 2002 11:58:03 -0600
Subject: Re: [ECOS] Unresolved conflict
References: <200207240738.g6O7caB16675@in.ceeyes.com> <02072410570801.01137@c1830598-a>

On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 11:57, NavEcos wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 July 2002 00:38, Venkatesh wrote:
> > Hi Rich,
> > I am using i386-pc target and windows configtool
> 
> Use configtool-2.03 instead of 2.11.
> 
> I know that combination works under *LINUX*.  The newest configtool
> for linux also fails to build an image, but for different reasons -
> uresolved symbols..
> 
> If you cannot get a configtool that old, just get the oldest one you
> can find..
> 
> If you are willing to move to linux, I can mail you my configtool too.
> I suspect now that eCos follows a gnu license that most of the
> development will be moving to Unix.
> 

Always has been, [Linux] actually :-)  We only provided Windows based 
tools for "political" reasons.




-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

References:
- Re: Unresolved conflict
  - From: Venkatesh
- Re: Unresolved conflict
  - From: NavEcos

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]