This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: How does people think of ecos's future compare to so m any existing RTOS? eg.RT-Linux, Embedded Linux, VxWorks, etc.. Welcome to discuss


> > We frequently would write abstraction layers on top of the OS
> > with inline functions or macros so we could switch operating
> > systems in midstream.  Nobody liked to be tied to a vendor.
> 
> We do exactly that, and I'd highly recommend it to other
> developers.  We have an OS abstraction layer that provides
> standard kernel type functionality such as thread scheduling
> and IPC in an OS independent manner.

Yup. That's the whole point of vendor-independant APIs like
Posix, uITRON, and sockets.  And eCos supports all three. :)

-- 
Grant Edwards
grante@visi.com

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]