This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: EB40/AT91 and EB40A Patches
Take a look at this thread from back in June:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss/2002-06/msg00496.html
I made the mistake of not erasing the at91 tree before applying
Thomas' patch - it's not really a patch per-se just a new at91
tree.
If you look at the email list archives from late May through
June and look for emails from me (Tim Drury) and Thomas Koeller,
you find a lot of info. I was probably one of the first people
to use Thomas'patch so I probably screwed up more than anyone
else.
-tim
Greg Holdren wrote:
Tim,
I have installed the tar files and both Thomas's and your ecos.db patch
files.
Your at91_patch fie is quite large so Im trying to let patch do this
one. In
any
case I seem to be missing the file, "var_io.h", in
"hal/arm/at91/var/current/include", so
its bombing on this part of it. Could I get yours? Should have at91.tar
provide this?
TNX
Greg Holdren
>Greg, you will probably only run into this problem when patching ecos.db
>since that file is constantly getting patched. Ecos.db is arranged as
>many small blocks of ~8 lines and it is very easy to merge changes by
>hand. It should be a fairly easy exercise to install the patches
>manually be changing/inserting the new blocks that pertain to the at91,
>eb40, eb40a, and eb40a flash driver.
>
>The bulk of the patches work on the hal/arm/at91 directory structure
>which, IIRC, Thomas' patch completely re-writes. Then my patch patches
>his patch :)
>
>Hopefully we'll be seeing all these at91 patches worked back into cvs
>soon.
>
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss