This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: USB version is 1.10?!

From: Sergei Organov <osv at javad dot ru>
To: Bart Veer <bartv at ecoscentric dot com>
Cc: jay at systech dot com, ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: 28 Nov 2002 19:02:41 +0300
Subject: Re: [ECOS] USB version is 1.10?!
References: <80B97DE95AEED311BA580050047FE98455D8D6@mail.systech.com><87hee33q2i.fsf@osv.javad.ru><20021128111022.71CA36165C@delenn.bartv.net>

Bart Veer <bartv@ecoscentric.com> writes:
[...]
> I am afraid the #define is not going to change, i.e. the default will
> remain 0x0110.

In fact I have nothing against this decision. Let it be whatever you think is
safer. My intention was to figure out if it is a mistake in eCos or my
misunderstanding of the specification, and according to your explanation it
is neither.

Thanks a lot for your responses.

BR,
Sergei.

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

References:
- RE: USB version is 1.10?!
  - From: Jay Foster
- Re: USB version is 1.10?!
  - From: Sergei Organov
- Re: USB version is 1.10?!
  - From: Bart Veer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]