This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: FOSDEM 2003 report
- From: Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>
- To: "David N. Welton" <davidw at dedasys dot com>
- Cc: eCos discussion <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 05:07:09 +0000
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] FOSDEM 2003 report
- References: <3E7A71CF.3020500@eCosCentric.com> <878yv94fx4.fsf@dedasys.com>
David N. Welton wrote:
However I know Bart has plans to try and do more TCL/Tk things,
particularly given the future requirements of CDL scripts. However
pretty much everyone else doesn't like the non-native look-and-feel
of TK widgets.
My impression was that modern Tcl/Tk versions have pretty good native
look and feel on Windows.
The omens aren't good on Unix when it comes to GNOME/GTK or KDE, but
perhaps that's a little too much to hope :-).
Does anyone have an example of a really good Tk app on Windows? With
screen shots? I've found TkPaint
<http://mars.netanya.ac.il/~samy/tkpaint.html> which I admit looks better
than I remember from the last time I ran TCL, but some of the fonts still
look odd for example (could be that particularl user's setup).
Although the other factor I didn't mention but is relevant to consider is
drawing/update speed. Tk apps have had a tendency to feel slow and clunky.
If this is all resolved then indeed going with Tk would be perfectly
alright IMO!
Jifl
--
eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss