This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Re debug Problem
- From: "Gary D. Thomas" <gary dot thomas at mind dot be>
- To: "Westwood, Geoff" <GWestwood at averyberkel dot com>
- Cc: "'ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com'" <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: 25 Mar 2003 08:50:57 -0700
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] Re debug Problem
- References: <D855107131D1D31199A300805F198C2F03902EEF@HO_NT_EXC_02>
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 08:38, Westwood, Geoff wrote:
> Hi Gary
>
>
> >What Viper 855T? - the Viper from Analogue & Micro is an 860T
> >(not that it makes much difference at this point)
>
> No, my Viper is definitely a PowerPC 855T. I don't think there is much
> difference between that and an 860T but I can't remember the specifics off
> the top of my head.
>
>
> Here is the gdb output I get if I switch remote debug on. The last rx packet
> looks a bit dubious ?
No - PowerPC register packets look like this since there are a boatload
of them.
<snip>
>
> >What happens if you try to connect via the serial port?
> >Have you tried turning on GDB debugging (set remotedebug 1)? This will
> >show something of what's going on.
>
>
> If I try to use Serial instead of Ethernet to download I get the same error
> message and a similar debug dump as shown above. The hex content of the last
> large packet differs slightly though.
>
So how does this output differ when you build the simple version that
lets you connect? I compared this output here with one of my Vipers
and it's pretty much identical - certainly in format - so I'm confused.
============================== mine ===================================================================
Packet received: OK
Sending packet: $qC#b4...Ack
Packet received: E02
Sending packet: $qOffsets#4b...Ack
Packet received:
Sending packet: $?#3f...Ack
Packet received: S05
Sending packet: $Hg0#df...Ack
Packet received: OK
Sending packet: $g#67...Ack
Packet received: 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
Sending packet: $m30000,8#c4...Ack
Packet received: 0000000000000000
============================= yours ===================================================================
Packet received: OK
Sending packet: $qC#b4...Ack
Packet received: E02
Sending packet: $qOffsets#4b...Ack
Packet received:
Sending packet: $?#3f...Ack
Packet received: S05
Sending packet: $Hg0#df...Ack
Packet received: OK
Sending packet: $g#67...Ack
Packet received: 0002d654000276ec00000001000000010002765cffffffff000000000000000000000004000200000000000100003200020000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000020fffffffd00020000000000000000320000030000000000030000000000003200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000e5fc00023032400000290001106c0001b7f86000002000000000
>
>
> > Using net instead of "new_net"
> >From the snapshot you are using, both network stacks built fine. What
> >problem did you encounter?
>
> I am sorry I can't remember the build error now, it would take me a while to
> rebuild this. I can do it if you think it would be useful to resolve the gdb
> problem ?
This would have no affect on the GDB issue.
--
.--------------------------------------------------------.
| Mind: Embedded Linux and eCos Development |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
| Gary Thomas email: gary dot thomas at mind dot be |
| Mind ( http://mind.be ) tel: +1 (970) 229-1963 |
| gpg: http://www.chez-thomas.org/gary/gpg_key.asc |
'--------------------------------------------------------'
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss