This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: need cdl help

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew dot lunn at ascom dot ch>
To: Jonathan Larmour <jifl at ecoscentric dot com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew dot lunn at ascom dot ch>, "Koeller, T." <Thomas dot Koeller at baslerweb dot com>, "ecos-discuss (E-Mail)" <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 14:41:19 +0200
Subject: Re: [ECOS] need cdl help
References: <850597605E79D21182830008C7A4B9CF1EB4258A@COMM1> <20030402090327.GL19607@biferten.ma.tech.ascom.ch> <3E8AD6FB.7090502@eCosCentric.com>

> Actually it is a bit of a mistake. When the interface has no 
> implementations, the requires will have no effect because the interface 
> will then be inactive (in the CDL sense). So in practice this would permit 
> no watchdog implementations.

What is the logic behind this? To me, 0 is just as valid as any other
number for an interface ? Can you still access an interfaces value
when its disabled? I guess so, other wise

     requires 1==CYGINT_WATCHDOG_IMPLEMENTATION

in the package would not correctly evaluate when it was zero.

   Andrew

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

References:
- need cdl help
  - From: Koeller, T.
- Re: need cdl help
  - From: Andrew Lunn
- Re: need cdl help
  - From: Jonathan Larmour

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]