This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Re: Errors making a component of eCos
- From: John Dallaway <jld at ecoscentric dot com>
- To: "Gregg C Levine" <drwho8 at worldnet dot att dot net>
- Cc: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:30:52 +0100
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] Re: Errors making a component of eCos
- Organization: eCosCentric Limited
- References: <200306100907.13651.jld@ecoscentric.com> <002601c32f6f$920ff320$239efea9@who5>
Hi Gregg
You wrote:
> Okay, here's the scoop, I gave the standard command to the Cygwin prompt,
> as you suggested, and it returned this one,
> "CYGWIN_98-4.10 who5 1.3.22(0.78/3/2) 2003-03-18 09:20 i686 unknown
> unknown Cygwin", doesn't mean anything to me. It might mean something to
> you. And that does contain the specie of Windows I have here. I hear what
> you are saying that the pre-century versions of Windows are considered to
> be unsupported by the team,
Specifically, it is Win95/98/ME that we no longer test against.
> but I do not have the budget to upgrade my
> hardware, which Dell prefers. That being stated, is there any other
> advice in the offering?
Certain recent versions of the Cygwin DLL are known to have problems when
running on Win95/98/ME which cause memory corruption resulting in internal
compiler errors. I should stress that these problems do not affect
WinNT4/2k/XP users. You could try using an earlier version of Cygwin. For
example, the GNU toolchains contributed by eCosCentric do appear to work OK
with Cygwin 1.3.18 on Win98 hosts. However, my only recommendation would be
to upgrade to an operating system against which eCos 2.0 has been tested.
John Dallaway
eCosCentric Limited
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss