This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: Agilent AAED2000 - LCD_SUPPORT.C
- From: "Oscar" <martinos72 at libero dot it>
- To: <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 20:24:10 +0200
- Subject: RE: [ECOS] Agilent AAED2000 - LCD_SUPPORT.C
I'm only studies the source to try to implement microwindows on my PXA255,
and take the most recently LCD_SUPPORT.C source. At the moment i'd like take
the simpliest way and i don't need LCD_COMM. OSCAR
-----Original Message-----
From: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com
[mailto:ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com] On Behalf Of Gary Thomas
Sent: mercoledì 8 ottobre 2003 21.12
To: Oscar
Cc: eCos Discussion
Subject: Re: [ECOS] Agilent AAED2000 - LCD_SUPPORT.C
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 12:07, Oscar wrote:
> Inside the function lcd_clear() there's a call to set_pixel(), but the
> set_pixel() function declaration is only after the
> CYGSEM_AAED2000_LCD_COMM option. If I don't select the option the
> set_pixel() not will be built e in consequence not available for
> lcd_clear(). Is it correct?
>
It looks that way. I don't recall ever trying to build without using the
LCD_COMM mode.
Do you actually have one of these units? AFAIK, they were only prototypes
and never saw commercial light of day.
--
Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
MLB Associates
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss