This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: RE : Licence consideratios.
- From: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn dot ch>
- To: Vincent Catros <Vincent dot Catros at elios-informatique dot fr>
- Cc: 'Andrew Lunn' <andrew at lunn dot ch>, ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:36:17 +0100
- Subject: [ECOS] Re: RE : [ECOS] Licence consideratios.
- References: <20040316145729.GB31390@lunn.ch> <000301c40b6b$b0d064b0$7407a8c0@figuier>
> In fact, licence terms were not included into the files I downloaded.
> I have contacted the original contributor that said to me the package
> was released under "RTEMs licence".
> Regarding the name of four licences, I assumed it was "Primary licence".
>
> Then I have included RTEMs "Primary licence" terms into files and
> submited those files to the original contributor for agreement.
> He gave me this agreement.
>
> But I can't switch to eCos licence as, I think, all contributors should
> give their agreement.
True.
>
> Is this a problem to include files into eCos distribution?
Now we know which license we are talking about, we can read it and see
if its compatible.
Andrew
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss