This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: few doubts related to delay_us implementation
- From: sandeep <shimple0 at yahoo dot com>
- To: Nick Garnett <nickg at ecoscentric dot com>
- Cc: ecos-discuss at ecos dot sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:06:30 +0530
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] few doubts related to delay_us implementation
- References: <41582044.2020401@yahoo.com> <m3mzzb21ys.fsf@xl5.calivar.com>
thanks nick for clearing the doubts,
### (eg. indirect call of delay_us in packages/io/flash/current/tests/flash1.c).
There is no such test as far as I can see. This is probably one of yours.
I don't understand how you don't see this test? I had done cvs update few
minutes before the mail. Here are the CVS folder entries -
CVS/Entries
-----------
/flash1.c/1.1/Tue Aug 24 13:28:10 2004//
D
CVS/Repository
--------------
ecos/packages/io/flash/current/tests
CVS/Root
--------
:pserver:anoncvs@sources.redhat.com:/cvs/ecos
if your remark is wrt to 'indirect call'; here is what i mean by indirect call -
there is a call to "CYGACC_CALL_IF_DELAY_US(1000); // Should be 1 second" in
cyg_start in above mentioned test.
--
regards
sandeep
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
A psychiatrist is a person who will give you expensive answers that
your wife will give you for free.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss