This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Lightweight C++ multithreaded exceptions
- From: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind dot harboe at zylin dot com>
- To: Jerome Souquieres <jerome dot souquieres at kis dot fr>
- Cc: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 12:19:25 +0200
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] Lightweight C++ multithreaded exceptions
- References: <1116664216.28556.45.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4291A7C3.5000801@kis.fr>
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 11:52 +0200, Jerome Souquieres wrote:
>
> That's interesting. However, from what I understand, this approach
> only solves the multithreaded exceptions problem. This does nothing to
> ensure that the standard C++ library (including STL) is thead safe. Am
> I right ?
I know there are some atomicity issues, but is that already handled in a
CPU architecture specific but os-independent fashion by default in
libstdc++?
Does anyone know of a definitive list of issues w.r.t. libstdc++ &
multithreading?
I guess the fact that eCosCentric is destined to contribute their
libstdc++ support saps my initiative for contributing patches in this
area. Even more so, because I have a solution for my needs.
--
Øyvind Harboe
http://www.zylin.com
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss