Re: [ECOS] Need help for tm_basic tests result interpretation[addon]

[GONZALEZ Laurent <laurent dot gonzalez at trango-systems dot com>]

hello,

I would bet for a misconfiguration in ecos.ecc, or a bug in excalibur HAL.

20 Mhz for an ARM9 ? Is this a typo, or did you really run at that speed ? In the latter case, did you change something in RTC constants defined by HAL ?

Moreever, it's worthy to note that I submitted a patch for tm_basic a few month ago, that fixes a scaling bug. See <http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-patches/2005-02/msg00033.html> and try it.

regards,

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:27:57 +0000
"Guilly A" <guilly_work@hotmail.com> wrote:

> I forgot some interesting lines :
> 
> eCos Kernel Timings
> Notes: all times are in microseconds (.000001) unless otherwise stated
> 
> Reading the hardware clock takes 2306 'ticks' overhead
> ... this value will be factored out of all other measurements
> Clock interrupt took 5257.09 microseconds (105141 raw clock ticks)
> 


-- 
GONZALEZ Laurent
-----------------------------------------
Real-Time OS Team Leader
TRANGO Systems - ELSYS Design Group
74, avenue des Martyrs
38000 Grenoble
Tel: 33 (0)4 76 12 28 44
Fax: 33 (0)4 76 12 28 49
-----------------------------------------
Trango, the real-time embedded hypervisor
http://www.trango-systems.com

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss