This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: eCos on Windows without Cygwin
On 2007-03-02, Alexander Neundorf <neundorf@kde.org> wrote:
> On Friday 02 March 2007 17:51, Ilija Koco wrote:
> ...
>> Yes, probably in large companies the managers and not engineers make
>> decisions, but maybe, if there's demand, someone will see competitive
>> advantage in porting tools to Linux.
>
> Sometimes even the actual developers working with eCos prefer
> Windows. So IMO Oyvind is not completely wrong here. Making it
> easier to develop for eCos under Windows (i.e. without cygwin)
> wouldn't be bad.
Nobody's said it would be bad. We are are saying that
expecting Linux users to do it is a bit unrealistic:
1) we don't know how
2) we've got other things we'd rather do
3) most of us don't really care
>From what I can tell the eCos maintainers all use Linux as do
most of the experienced users.
If you wanted to pony up £100,000 or so, I'm sure eCosCentric
(or somebody) could be contracted to cobble up a Windows
development environment that doesn't depend so much on Cygwin.
It's still going to have to include bash, Gnu make, TCL, etc. I
suppose you could try to use "native" Win32 clones of those
tools (do such things exist). So it's not going to be much
simpler than a frozen subset of Cygwni anyway...
--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! I'm having an
at EMOTIONAL OUTBURST!! But,
visi.com uh, WHY is there a WAFFLE
in my PAJAMA POCKET??
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss