This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sourceware.org mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: What is the current status of the iPaq application? (target)

From: Grant Edwards <grante at visi dot com>
To: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:01:34 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [ECOS] Re: What is the current status of the iPaq application? (target)
References: <18d205ed0810251437x7dbc1c80xa794938849202948@mail.gmail.com> <55a968a30810261339l49215e8gb79b8ea16f3c91c2@mail.gmail.com> <18d205ed0810261758q189f8aebsf6d7510c82b8f439@mail.gmail.com> <20081027054008.GD20110@lunn.ch> <18d205ed0810290639s5bba9cerb152419840453027@mail.gmail.com> <ge9t80$2c7$1@ger.gmane.org> <F31C1582037F5041B0CD525FD870AE6A012E8C35@ny2545.corp.bloomberg.com> <ge9vri$e5b$1@ger.gmane.org> <F31C1582037F5041B0CD525FD870AE6A012E8C36@ny2545.corp.bloomberg.com>

On 2008-10-29, Chris Zimman <czimman@bloomberg.com> wrote:

>> This has probably been answered before, but what's broken about
>> the gcc ARM target such it that requires newlib?  Or is this an
>> eCos requirement?

> It's not really "broken" and isn't really related to eCos.
> You can build a C only GCC without newlib.

Ah, that's the clue I was missing.  My other cross-compilers
are C-only.  It hadn't occurred to me that libc was required to
schlep all of that C++ baggage around.

-- 
Grant Edwards                   grante             Yow! I want to so HAPPY,
                                  at               the VEINS in my neck STAND
                               visi.com            OUT!!


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

References:
- What is the current status of the iPaq application? (target)
  - From: Gregg Levine
- Re: What is the current status of the iPaq application? (target)
  - From: luasi dubay
- Re: What is the current status of the iPaq application? (target)
  - From: Gregg Levine
- Re: What is the current status of the iPaq application? (target)
  - From: Andrew Lunn
- Re: What is the current status of the iPaq application? (target)
  - From: Gregg Levine
- Re: What is the current status of the iPaq application? (target)
  - From: Grant Edwards
- RE: Re: What is the current status of the iPaq application? (target)
  - From: Chris Zimman
- Re: What is the current status of the iPaq application? (target)
  - From: Grant Edwards
- RE: Re: What is the current status of the iPaq application? (target)
  - From: Chris Zimman

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]