This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: NAND support
- From: John Dallaway <john at dallaway dot org dot uk>
- To: Simon Kallweit <simon dot kallweit at intefo dot ch>
- Cc: eCos Discuss <ecos-discuss at ecos dot sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 09:58:38 +0100
- Subject: [ECOS] Re: NAND support
- References: <49FFE56B.2070009@intefo.ch>
Hi Simon
Simon Kallweit wrote:
> I was wondering what the current state of the NAND subsystem from Rutger
> Hofman is. I'm currently working on a port of the UFFS filesystem
> (http://gouffs.googlepages.com/) which is intended to work on NAND
> flash. Are there any major arguments against merging his code into the
> eCos trunk? Anything that needs to be addressed? I would be willing to
> contribute a synth NAND driver as well as support for the STM32 target.
UFFS looks like a good fit for eCos. However, it is licensed under the
LGPL. I wonder if the authors would be willing to license the filesystem
under the eCos public license (dual license) and make a copyright
assignment to the FSF. Is this something you have discussed with them?
Our current policies do not allow us to accept LPGL run-time code into
the eCos repository.
I assume that your port would sit under the standard eCos Flash I/O
layer (CYGPKG_IO_FLASH). As with all imported packages, it would also be
important to:
* Minimise changes to the imported source code so it is as easy as
possible to keep the eCos port up to date.
* Provide all the configurability offered within the imported code as
eCos CDL options.
John Dallaway
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss