This is the mail archive of the ecos-maintainers@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: AIM711 serial drivers

From: Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>
To: Roland Caßebohm <roland dot cassebohm at visionsystems dot de>
Cc: John Dallaway <jld at ecoscentric dot com>,ecos-maintainers at ecos dot sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:12:48 +0100
Subject: Re: AIM711 serial drivers
References: <200406172330.55625.jld@ecoscentric.com> <200406181013.00385.roland.cassebohm@visionsystems.de> <40D2A7EF.5020105@ecoscentric.com>

John Dallaway wrote:

Hi Roland

Roland Caßebohm wrote:
Should I seperate them like:
devs/serial/arm/aim711
devs/serial/arm/aim711_16x5x
devs/serial/arm/aim711_s3c4510
or better:
devs/serial/arm/aim711/aim711
devs/serial/arm/aim711/aim711_16x5x
devs/serial/arm/aim711/aim711_s3c4510
There is no strong precedent in the existing package directory hierarchy since most platforms use only one serial driver, but I think the second arrangement would indeed be preferable.

Alternatively it may work okay to continue with a single package, with one ecos.db entry, but have the three parts as cdl_components rahter than cdl_packages.

Jifl
--
eCosCentric    http://www.eCosCentric.com/    The eCos and RedBoot experts
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine

References:
- AIM711 serial drivers
  - From: John Dallaway
- Re: AIM711 serial drivers - Checked by AntiVir DEMO version - - Checked
  - From: Roland Caßebohm
- Re: AIM711 serial drivers
  - From: John Dallaway

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]