Hi Jifl, Ricky and Simon
Jonathan Larmour wrote:
John Dallaway wrote:
Jifl, can you also advise here please? Could dual licensing of UFFS
under both LGPL and the eCos Public License be achieved with a single
source base using a single license banner?
Both these licences are acceptable to the FSF, so I can't see any issue
with it.
There's then the matter of how to achieve this. Here's my recommendation
of how to modify the banner:
[ snip ]
Jifl, thanks for the example license text. This seems much more sensible
than maintaining two sets of sources with different license headers.
Ricky, are you happy to incorporate the license headers proposed by Jifl
into your master sources?