This is the mail archive of the
ecos-maintainers@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
- From: "H Hartley Sweeten" <hartleys at visionengravers dot com>
- To: "Austin, Brian" <Brian dot Austin at cirrus dot com>
- Cc: "Jonathan Larmour" <jifl at jifvik dot org>, "Gary Thomas" <gary at mlbassoc dot com>, <ecos-patches at ecos dot sourceware dot org>, "eCos Maintainers" <ecos-maintainers at ecos dot sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:30:07 -0500
- Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
- References: <BD79186B4FD85F4B8E60E381CAEE1909019173AD@mi8nycmail19.Mi8.com> <4A300CB0.5060102@mlbassoc.com> <4A356538.5090507@jifvik.org> <4A35A196.9010801@mlbassoc.com> <BD79186B4FD85F4B8E60E381CAEE190901CBF43E@mi8nycmail19.Mi8.com> <4AB2A1E4.3020703@jifvik.org> <BD79186B4FD85F4B8E60E381CAEE190901D41E30@mi8nycmail19.Mi8.com> <C171323BB93CB94897E300CBB6D4537F1D941E21@CLMSG-01.ad.cirrus.com>
On Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:19 PM, Austin, Brian wrote:
>
> Crap! Sorry guys,
>
> I'll mail that off.
>
Hello Brian,
Hate to be a pain but, did you ever get the paperwork submitted to the
FSF to transfer the copyright assignment for the Cirrus ep93xx eCos
port?
Thanks,
Hartley
-----Original Message-----
From: H Hartley Sweeten [mailto:hartleys@visionengravers.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:11 PM
To: Austin, Brian
Cc: Jonathan Larmour; Gary Thomas; ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org;
eCos Maintainers
Subject: RE: Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9 support
On Thursday, September 17, 2009 1:54 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> On Sunday, June 14, 2009 6:19 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does anyone know the status of the Cirrus Logic EP93XX ARM9
support?
>>>>>> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000739
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Was the copyright assignment to the FSF completed? If so, would
it
>>>>>> be possible to at least get the new file pieces of the patch into
>>>>>> CVS so that they can be cleaned up? The diff appears fairly
clean
>>>>>> except for a couple of issues. Following are the files in the
patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> AFAIK, we've not had official confirmation from FSF yet.
>>>>
>>>> Unless they've submitted it very recently, then I suspect they
never
>>>> made an assignment.
>>>
>>> They claim to have submitted it [not so] recently - probably April
>>> timeframe, maybe a bit later. It should be in the logs (I don't
have
>>> time to search right now).
>>
>>
>> Does anyone know the status of this?
>>
>> I have a number of updates/cleanups I would like to submit but the
>> original patch is still not in CVS.
>
> I'm afraid there is still no record with the FSF that they've
submitted an
> assignment. Either the FSF haven't updated their master database, or
they
> never actually completed the assignment. I think you'd need to ask
Cirrus.
Hello Brian,
On May 12, 2009 you posted this message to the ecos-discuss list:
> I am sending off the contracts to the FSF, and have posted the patch
for
> the Cirrus Port's to the ecos bugzilla. Hopefully someone will start
to
> forward port the code base.
Did the contracts ever get submitted? Your patch is still in the ecos
bugzilla but cannot be added until they receive the official
confirmation
from FSF.
Thanks,
Hartley