This is the mail archive of the ecos-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [ECOS] libc-time-clock test doesn't seem to be written correctly??

From: Brij Bihari Pandey <fuzzhead012 at yahoo dot com>
To: Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>
Cc: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com, ecos-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 08:51:39 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [ECOS] libc-time-clock test doesn't seem to be written correctly??

Hi Jonathan,

> > test FAIL messages. Possibly I would have - how could there be problem with
the
> > test, wouldn't anyone on list have mentioned it earlier, if it was so?
>
> Not necessarily I suppose. But there would probably have been something in 
> the wide variety of hardware that used to exist in the Red Hat test farm.

You mean eCos people at RedHat were aware of this problem?

I am attaching the "cvs diff -u5 -p" output for the clock.c file along with
this mail for your reviewing.

Changelog :
Added permissible absolute deviation from mean value to take care of incorrect
failure conclusions in case of small mean values.

brij


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

Attachment: clock_c.patch
Description: clock_c.patch

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ECOS] libc-time-clock test doesn't seem to be written correctly??
  - From: Jonathan Larmour

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]