Re: problem with gcc3.2 compiler

[Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>]

Gary Thomas wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 12:03, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>
> > Bart Veer wrote:
> >
> > > Question for Mark - do you happen to know if -finit-priority was
> > > already the default by gcc 2.95.2? Alternatively, does anybody still
> > > have a vintage compiler of that era around and can run some tests? I
> > > think 2.95.2 is the oldest version of the compiler we care about. If
> > > -finit-priority was already ignored by then we could just extend the
> > > pkgconf/rules.mak hack to remove it completely. That would be
> > > preferable to trying to figuring out the compiler version at
> > > configure-time or build-time.
> >
> > As it happens, I have 2.95 sources sitting here, and it does indeed look 
> > like -finit-priority was the default in 2.95 (and presumably 2.95.2).
>
>
> Don't you have two rules to drop -finit-priority?

Pedant ;). Yep, fair cop. I guess I may as well just go ahead and check 
this patch in.

Jifl
--
eCosCentric    http://www.eCosCentric.com/    The eCos and RedBoot experts
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine