This is the mail archive of the
ecos-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: at91 cdl refactoring , settable baudrate from redboot
- From: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn dot ch>
- To: Thomas Koeller <thomas dot koeller at baslerweb dot com>
- Cc: ecos-patches at sources dot redhat dot com,Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>, Jani Monoses <jani at iv dot ro>
- Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 13:03:28 +0200
- Subject: Re: at91 cdl refactoring , settable baudrate from redboot
- References: <20040212162319.575dd4a4.jani@iv.ro> <40369581.1070209@eCosCentric.com> <200403081317.24085.thomas.koeller@baslerweb.com> <200408301401.55874.thomas.koeller@baslerweb.com>
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 02:01:55PM +0200, Thomas Koeller wrote:
> On Monday 08 March 2004 13:17, Thomas Koeller wrote:
> > Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> > > I'll hold off reverting the relevant parts of the patch (i.e. return bits
> > > back to the platform HALs) straight away so people have a chance to
> > > comment.
> >
> > Jonathan,
> >
> > do you think you need much longer to make a decision as to whether this
> > patch should be reverted or not? As I wrote earlier, I have a couple of
> > platform HAL packages that would need to be adopted if this change were to
> > stay, but of course I do not want to do that if things are likely to be
> > changed back later. But if I dont, I cannot update my repository.
> >
> > FWIW, I agree with you that most of the cdl options in question should be
> > in the platfrom HAl for maximum flexibility. The platform HAL packages I am
> > maintaining are not exactly like one of the evaluation boards. Some of them
> > have additional I/O channels besides the two serial ports, and they do in
> > fact use a special startup mode, which is a variant of the ROMRAM mode that
> > leaves .rodata in rom.
> >
> > tk
>
> Hi Jani and Jonathan,
>
> I created a patch that undoes Jani's changes that broke all my HAL packages.
OK. Time for action...... Jani, any comments or should i just commit
this patch.
Andrew