Re: LPC2xxx patch for support of vectored interrupt controller

[Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn dot ch>]

> > Should there also be another check like:
> > 
> >  CYG_ASSERT(vector <= CYGNUM_HAL_ISR_MAX &&
> >             vector >= CYGNUM_HAL_ISR_MIN , "Invalid vector");
> > 
> > If you pass it an invalid vector, such as 33, you end up shifting 1 by
> > 33 which i guess results in 0. The code will then set/reset the level
> > on every single interrupt!
> 
> This assertion cannot fail if the previous assertion did not fail

O.K. Fine. I just asked the question, is this needed. And the answer is now clear. No.

     Thanks
        Andrew