This is the mail archive of the
ecos-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: cortexm stm32 invert backup domain protect macros
Simon Kallweit <simon.kallweit@intefo.ch> writes:
> >
> >> Thinking about it after having done the checkin, I'm not entirely
> >> happy with the naming of CYGHWR_HAL_STM32_BD_UNPROTECT() and
> >> hal_stm32_bd_unprotect(). The un... parts could be a little
> >> confusing
> >> and the sense of things seems wrong. I would be happier with
> >> CYGHWR_HAL_STM32_BD_PROTECT() and hal_stm32_bd_protect() with a
> >> matching inversion of the meaning of the argument. It is probably not
> >> worth worrying about immediately, but is something that might need to
> >> change in the future.
> >>
> >
> > I see your point, I'll change that tomorrow.
>
> Here is the patch to change CYGHWR_HAL_STM32_BD_UNPROTECT() to
> CYGHWR_HAL_STM32_BD_PROTECT(). I guess this is better done early than
> later.
Now checked in.
--
Nick Garnett eCos Kernel Architect
eCosCentric Limited http://www.eCosCentric.com The eCos experts
Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 1223 245571
Registered in England and Wales: Reg No: 4422071