This is the mail archive of the
ecos-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Support for Olimex LPC-H2294, LPC-E2294, LPC-L2294-1M targets
- From: Sergei Gavrikov <sergei dot gavrikov at gmail dot com>
- To: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn dot ch>
- Cc: eCos patches list <ecos-patches at ecos dot sourceware dot org>
- Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:39:42 +0200
- Subject: Re: Support for Olimex LPC-H2294, LPC-E2294, LPC-L2294-1M targets
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=G+dZByA534ktsspv+KkN2OzZo49jyj6v1MklM/V4Bdg=; b=TjLOdKScPo62wCpfDB7lvTS0mNQja0xQL/1zEdY8wy5FOg+bwrVMDnZajQcpgKu0OT PRW0Sn63wKPGfwsgpP42l/ekp/SBuslL8WhdBnBVW58A74qVlkm3uxRqQl3+uNG7gOH6 VWJiX4u+apViHLrfzaiS2AqqABVY6cfhjn964=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=l5uZuLmTcSAHMj8Usta0iw8GllILiAYwxrHQAwRA95Lq9inG8NLkQo1dIiZqksR7JY gq5hP21z2MoJMDccAf7fIJ9ve49Otj//HgNSnLGiNk+fHJSp5r/v8Rp1s8q/x676FHMM 5stA/tY5EzlQ6Jsm+WQjp65ikXWL8WnJmuov4=
- References: <20081103205406.GA9692@ubuntu.local> <20081107182918.GA13070@ubuntu.local> <20081120202139.GK17925@lunn.ch> <20081120204734.GA12716@ubuntu.local> <20081120215747.GL17925@lunn.ch> <20081121022731.GA29411@ubuntu.local> <20081123121630.GQ17925@lunn.ch>
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 01:16:30PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Reworked: 3 flash packages became one: CYGPKG_DEVS_FLASH_ARM_OLPCX2294.
> > dirname is lower cased dev/flash/arm/olpcx2294. Andrew, please, remove
> > previous patches. I fix CFLAGS for arm-eabi and did refresh redboot's
> > ecm files. There are redboot_RAM.ecm, redboot_ROM.ecm and minimalist
> > redboot_ROM_minimal.ecm (no flash, eth, just serial) in the 'misc' dir.
> > for the targets. I put all in one patch and new ecos.db.tail as well. Is
> > it okay?
>
> Thanks for the rework.
>
> Here is the first issue i found when compile testing.
>
> The olpch2294 target includes
> CYGPKG_DEVICES_WATCHDOG_ARM_LPC2XXX. However when you include the
> generic watchdog package you get:
[snip]
> It seems like the other targets have the same problem as well.
Hi, I ponted on that in past:
http://sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss/2008-09/msg00038.html
It seems that was not been applied.
Sergei
- References:
- Support for Olimex LPC-H2294, LPC-E2294, LPC-L2294-1M targets
- Re: Support for Olimex LPC-H2294, LPC-E2294, LPC-L2294-1M targets
- Re: Support for Olimex LPC-H2294, LPC-E2294, LPC-L2294-1M targets
- Re: Support for Olimex LPC-H2294, LPC-E2294, LPC-L2294-1M targets
- Re: Support for Olimex LPC-H2294, LPC-E2294, LPC-L2294-1M targets
- Re: Support for Olimex LPC-H2294, LPC-E2294, LPC-L2294-1M targets
- Re: Support for Olimex LPC-H2294, LPC-E2294, LPC-L2294-1M targets