This is the mail archive of the
ecos-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
[Bug 1001142] User defined linker sections.
- From: bugzilla-daemon at bugs dot ecos dot sourceware dot org
- To: ecos-patches at ecos dot sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:11:27 +0000
- Subject: [Bug 1001142] User defined linker sections.
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-1001142-104@http.bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/>
Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at:
http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001142
--- Comment #26 from John Dallaway <john@dallaway.org.uk> 2011-02-16 10:11:25 GMT ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> In comment 9 Sergei wrote:
> > If we do not need those defs at all, I would be happy with (not tested)
>
> In comment 10 John wrote:
> > It does seem preferable to eliminate the SECTION_START() and SECTION_END()
> > macros if possible. I assume these macros are not used elsewhere.
>
> In comment 23 Ilija wrote:
> > Now I agree with you to omit START/END macros.
>
> Consensus? If it is, Ilija, could you, please, submit a final patch for
> cortexm.ld after testing?
If I've understood correctly, you (Ilija and Sergei) are now in agreement that
peripheral memory section names will need not require de-stringification. I
agree with this. In fact, I expect peripheral memory sections will typically
have fixed names. Packages like lwIP will be configured to use the section name
provided by the HAL package, not vice-versa.
So lets eliminate the SECTION_START() and SECTION_END() macros and add a single
USER_SECTION() macro to cortexm.ld. We can check this in ahead of the LPC17xx
contribution and it will be one less thing to hold in our minds.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.