This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Unifying i387 support
> So, something like:
>
> #define REGISTER_NAMES { "eax", "ecx", "edx", "ebx", \
> "esp", "ebp", "esi", "edi", \
> "eip", "eflags","cs", "ss", \
> "ds", "es", "fs", "gs", \
> "fctrl","fstat","ftag", "fioff",\
> "fiseg","fop", "fdoff","fdseg",\
> "st", "st1", "st2", "st3", \
> "st4", "st5", "st6", "st7",}
>
> Why "st" instead of "st0"?
That's what the Pentium manual calls it. But I care not in the
slightest.