This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

TODO updates


Just FYI,

Before 5.0 gets officially released, I intend re-doing the file so that
it starts with known bugs/problems.

	Andrew
Mon Apr  3 18:20:03 2000  Andrew Cagney  <cagney@b1.cygnus.com>

	* TODO: Update.
	
Index: TODO
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/TODO,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -p -r1.3 TODO
*** TODO	2000/03/29 03:51:18	1.3
--- TODO	2000/04/03 08:35:47
*************** release of GDB.
*** 28,61 ****
  
  --
  
- Watch point related patches (Eli Zaretskii, Michael Snyder, ???)
- 
- Eli writes: This doesn't include the watchpoint-related patches I sent
- beginning with August or September, and mentioned them again three
- weeks ago.  Here again are the pointers to the relevant messages:
- 
- Hardware breakpoints and watchpoints: patches
- http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/1999-q3/msg00173.html
- 
- Re: Hardware breakpoints and watchpoints: patches
- http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/1999-q3/msg00204.html
- 
- Re: Hardware breakpoints and watchpoints: patches
- http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/1999-q4/msg00200.html
- 
- Hardware watchpoints for bitfields
- http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/1999-q4/msg00201.html
- 
- --
- 
- Tom's speedups to GDB (Tom Tromey, Jim Blandy)
- 
- I believe that there was a late breaking fix that stopped a coredump.
- 
- http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00869.html
- 
- --
- 
  Solaris/x86 - which? (Nick Duffek, Peter Schauer, Michael Snyder?)
  
  Nick D's working through patches from Michael Snyder and Peter S.
--- 28,33 ----
*************** you're introducing discrepancies between
*** 224,234 ****
  and everybody is confused - witness the lack of doc for the tracing
  commands still, some two years after they were added...
  
! [PATCH] GDB command-line switches and annotations docs
  http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00639.html
  
  --
  
  GDB 5.0: Won't have
  -------------------
  
--- 196,212 ----
  and everybody is confused - witness the lack of doc for the tracing
  commands still, some two years after they were added...
  
! Discussion on MI can be found on the thread: [PATCH] GDB command-line
! switches and annotations docs
  http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00639.html
  
  --
  
+ Revised UDP support (was: Re: [Fwd: [patch] UDP transport support])
+ http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-04/msg00000.html
+ 
+ --
+ 
  GDB 5.0: Won't have
  -------------------
  
*************** Needs further debate.
*** 287,292 ****
--- 265,283 ----
  
  Re: [PATCH] Add change-log variables to more MI files
  http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00811.html
+ 
+ --
+ 
+ Re: gdb-cvs fails on freebsd-elf
+ http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-04/msg00004.html
+ 
+ FreeBSD haven't contributed their local GDB changes back to the master
+ sources (they would at least need an FSF assignment by all
+ individuales that contributed to the work).  Given the strong
+ likelhood that this will never happen, I'd suggest that a better
+ strategy would be for someone (with an FSF/GDD assignment) to do a new
+ (clean-room) implementation.  That can then be accepted in time for
+ GDB 5.1.
  
  --
  

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]