This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Cleanup some more section_addr_info structs
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup some more section_addr_info structs
- From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 10:13:29 -0400 (EDT)
- Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at cygnus dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, cfg at cygnus dot com, jimb at cygnus dot com
- References: <14591.20957.40807.102577@kwikemart.cygnus.com><38FFC38B.552164F6@cygnus.com>
Andrew Cagney writes:
> Elena Zannoni wrote:
> >
> > [Who is the som maintainer? Do we have one?]
> >
> > I forgot to get rid of these uses of the special field
> > text_addr of section_addr_info:
>
> Jim being the symtab maintainer is the nearest thing we've got (Hi
> Jim!).
>
> If he can't see anything wrong with it (but there is no need to bend
> over backwards to ensure that is the case) then it should go in. Are
> you able to check that the target that uses ``som*.[hc]'' has no
> regressions?
>
> Andrew
Yes I built and testsed on an hpux machine. I am going to check this
in then.
Elena