This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Re: x86 linux GDB and SIGALRM
- To: jimb at zwingli dot cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Re: x86 linux GDB and SIGALRM
- From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis at wins dot uva dot nl>
- Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 00:51:07 +0200
- CC: gdb-patches at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, ezannoni at cygnus dot com
- References: <38DBF46A.8EABE9BF@redhat.co.uk> <38DF3159.DF837D7D@cygnus.com><200003271020.MAA25618@landau.wins.uva.nl><38F245CE.A2B7B5D0@redhat.co.uk><200005011853.e41Ir7N06091@delius.kettenis.local> <npd7n6gewq.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com>
Date: 01 May 2000 16:05:09 -0500
I last changed this code to allow GDB to step over calls to
pthread_create properly. If you can still do a "next" over a call to
pthread_create after your change, I have no further comments. The
test gdb.threads/linux-dp.exp ought to run on Linux and verify that
this works.
Those tests are all passed, both with and without libthread_db
assistence on my i586-pc-linux-gnu system. Do I still have to wait
for approval from Elana, or am I misreading MAINTAINERS?
Mark