This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [Patch 2/7]: 68HC11 port of gdb (sim)
- To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
- Subject: Re: [Patch 2/7]: 68HC11 port of gdb (sim)
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 21:17:28 +1000
- CC: Stephane dot Carrez at worldnet dot fr, Stephane dot Carrez at free dot fr, gdb-patches at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <200006280517.BAA11564@indy.delorie.com>
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 00:09:17 +0200
> > From: Stephane Carrez <Stephane.Carrez@worldnet.fr>
> > >
> > > > gdb/sim/m68hc11/dv-m68hc11.c
> > > > gdb/sim/m68hc11/dv-m68hc11eepr.c
> > > > gdb/sim/m68hc11/dv-m68hc11sio.c
> > > > gdb/sim/m68hc11/dv-m68hc11spi.c
> > > > gdb/sim/m68hc11/dv-m68hc11tim.c
> > >
> > > The names of these 5 files all clash after truncation to DOS 8+3
> > > namespace limits, so they make it harder for users to unpack the GDB
> > > distribution on MS-DOS and Windows 3.X systems. Since these files are
> > > all in an m68hc11 subdirectory, I wonder whether you could remove the
> > > m68hc11 part from the file names altogether?
> >
> > I've tried to follow the mips simulator where the file names are
> >
> > dv-tx3904cpu.c
> > dv-tx3904irc.c
> > dv-tx3904sio.c
> > dv-tx3904tmr.c
> >
> > and they have the same problem you pointed out (mn10300 either).
I don't think it is worth worrying about the files in the sim
directory. We (well I or Stephane) will need to update
gdb/config/djgpp/fnname.lst.
The reason the ``tx3904'' and ``mn103'' appear in the name is because
there are other variants with different hardware configs.
Andrew