Re: RFA: patch to fix 'info dcache' crash

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>]

"J.T. Conklin" wrote:

> Andrew> 5.1 or 5.2?
> 
> Most likely 5.2.

:-) all is ok with me.

.  By 'target' dcache do you mean an
> Andrew> extra one of those target layers?
> 
> No.  At present, the various targets that support the data cache
> create their own dcache in their to_open() vector.  If dcache is moved
> above the target vectors, we need a to create a new dcache
> corresponding to the whole 'current_target' regardless of what
> vector(s) are used to implement it.  initialize_targets() would create
> this dcache,

Ok. That sounds good.

	Andrew