Re: tracepoints implementation: bug in byte code generating.

["Josef Ezra" <jezra at emc dot com>]

> Josef Ezra wrote:
>
> > Michael
> >
> > 1. Your code is better. I can't resist this modification.
>
> Thanks, I'll check it in.
>
> > 2. In the future, I will try to follow change-log-entry roles,
> > sorry for this one.
>
> Thanks, no need to appologize.  It's a learning curve.
>
> > 3. I would like to add commands to the remote protocol, is there a gnu
> > routine to standardizes some of those changed?
>
> Ah, you might be on thin ice.
> Are your changes confined to the tracepoint protocol?
> Those should be LESS controvercial than otherwise, since
> they're in "Q" and 'q' packets (special purpose packets
> that other stubs can ignore.
>
> Any changes to the remote protocol can be discussed
> on this mailing list.
>
> Michael
>

Actually I had in mind a 'show protocol version' command (for backward
compatibility) and a special read memory command (like "mxxxx,lll") which
can be used at target side for special reads (in my case, it will show
values in different memory scope).

If it will turn out to be very useful, I will suggest it in this forum.

Josef